Law firms

    Run the Physics Before You Bet on the Case.

    Your client says one thing. The police report says another. Silent Witness tests both against the crash before you spend six figures backing the wrong story.

    $100 per case
    silentwitness.com
    Silent Witness case intelligence dashboard scoring a personal injury case
    The Problem

    Watch One Case Go Through

    A file walks in Monday. From that moment, every decision is money: sign it, fund it, preserve it, push it, walk away.

    MONDAY, 9:14 AM

    The file walks in. The answers don't.

    Minor rear-end collision. Your client reports neck pain and thinks she hit her head. The police report says she braked abruptly and contributed to the crash.

    • Is her account true? Is the report? Which injuries survive the physics?
    • Photos, estimate, report, and intake go into Silent Witness.
    • Without Silent Witness: Intake picks whichever story sounds more believable.
    View the report
    14 crash photos1 repair estimate1 police report3 alleged injuries
    Physics engine62%
    TUESDAY, 9:00 AM

    Now the stories have evidence attached.

    The police report and the physical evidence disagree. The cervical claim has a supported mechanism.

    • You are no longer choosing who to believe. You are testing what happened.
    • Without Silent Witness: Same file. Same conflicting stories. Still guessing.
    View the report
    Case strength78 /100
    Head positionRotated at impactC5-C6 claimMechanically supported
    WEDNESDAY, 9:00 AM

    Now you know what to preserve before it disappears.

    Not more evidence. The evidence that will matter later, while you can still get it.

    • Without Silent Witness: The vehicle gets repaired Friday. The EDR that could settle the braking dispute goes with it.
    View the report
    Recommended evidence actions
    01Preserve available EDR data.02Photograph identified occupant contact areas.03Document head position and passenger interaction.04Preserve evidence relevant to the disputed braking claim.
    WEEK 3 SANDBOX

    Before you fund the injuries, make them survive the crash.

    Medical records come in. Silent Witness tests each alleged injury against the reconstructed collision, occupant motion, loading direction, positioning, and medical history.

    • A client can honestly remember a crash wrong. Your firm should not spend six figures before anyone checks.
    • Without Silent Witness: The workup starts. The defense biomechanist is the first person to actually reconstruct the mechanism.
    View the report
    C5-C6 DISC CLAIMMECHANICALLY SUPPORTED
    REPORTED HEAD IMPACT / TBINOT SUPPORTED BY CURRENT EVIDENCE
    Build the cervical case. Do not build a TBI theory without additional support.NOT SUPPORTED BY CURRENT EVIDENCE
    MONTH 4

    The demand goes out with evidence, not adjectives.

    The carrier can challenge the analysis. They cannot dismiss it as another lawyer calling the crash "significant."

    • Without Silent Witness: Your story meets their story. Nobody has quantified the crash.
    View the report
    Delta-VDocumentedOccupant KinematicsReconstructedCervical MechanismSupportedBraking Account ConflictIdentified
    LITIGATION

    The technical work does not start when the lawsuit does.

    The expert enters a technically built file, not seven months of records and a request to figure out what happened.

    View the report
    $1,500flat, per caseAvailable
    Report reviewSigned findingsDeposition availability
    A testifying expert adopts the findings and signs
    DEPOSITION

    You already know their expert's argument. He just hasn't said it under oath yet.

    You walk in knowing the theory, the assumptions underneath it, and where to attack.

    View the report
    Trial toolsDeposition
    Cross-examination
    What calculation determined the delta-V?Did you account for the documented head position?What published data supports your threshold?
    You walk in already knowing their argument
    The Difference

    Same File. Different Decisions.

    There’s no chatbot column here. Chatbots can’t do this. The alternatives are a human expert or reconstruction software, and here’s how those actually stack up.

    WITHOUT IT
    The whole caseTested
    Client account: believed or doubted.
    1-3 mph, validatedTested
    Police report: accepted or argued.
    Anyone with photosNot Supported · Six-Figure Workup Avoided
    Injuries: funded before mechanisms are tested.
    48 hoursIdentified Early
    Evidence: preserved by habit.
    $100Physics Attached
    Demand: competing narratives.
    Built for DaubertSurfaced Before Deposition
    Defense theory: learned late.
    The Part That Should Worry You

    You’re Betting Six Figures Before Anyone Runs the Physics.

    Your client has a story. The police report has another. Those two stories decide what you sign, what you fund, and what you spend the next two years fighting over. Nobody has tested either one.

    silentwitness.com
    Silent Witness case intelligence dashboard scoring a live case

    There's a File in Your Inbox You Don't Understand as Well as You Think.

    Send it. Photos and a repair estimate are enough. See what your team is signing, funding, and arguing without knowing.